Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38652 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANAN District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar, S/o Chhabila Yadav, R/o Vill.- Basmatia, P.S.- Chanan, Disrict- Lakhisarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chanan P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that petitioner along with his brother Rahul Kumar assaulted the informant and his brother with iron rod, lathi etc. It is further alleged that altercation had taken place on account of demanding huge amount by the informant which was due with Rahul Kumar, brother of the petitioner.
The injury reports of both the injured have been enclosed as Annexure-3 series wherein the Doctor has found simple injury on the person of the injured.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38652 of 2018 (2) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T