Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79649/2025bail granted

Anand Kumar @ Anand Kumar Rajappan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-01Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79649 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-556 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Anand Kumar @ Anand Kumar Rajappan S/O Mr. Ramkrishnan Rajappan R/O Pulkit Apartment- 501, P.S.- D. N. Nagar, District- Mumbai, State - Maharashtra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Prashant Kumar Poddar S/O Sri Pradeep Kumar Poddar R/O Hotel Lane, Frazer Road, P.S- Kotwali, Distt.- Patna, Bihar (Sole, Proprietor of M/S Shree Ambey Traders, 76, Vrindavan Vihar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 556 (C) of 2017, instituted for the offences under Sections 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that petitioner along with other co-accused embezzled money of the Opposite party No.2 with oblique motive.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The present case is misuse of privilege of bail earlier

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79649 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/3 granted to the petitioner. Earlier, the petitioner has been granted regular bail vide order dated 05.02.2018 by the learned ACJMX, Patna. He further submits that due to non-appearance of petitioner, the bail bond of the petitioner got cancelled vide order dated 01.06.2022. Thereafter, petitioner has been arrested on 26.07.2025. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has not been given any information regarding cancellation of his bail bond by his counsel. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner undertakes to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner as also the undertaking given by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79649 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 556 (C) of 2017, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T