Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83336/2023dismissed

Raju Ram @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-08Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83336 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2023 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR District- Siwan ====================================================== Raju Ram @ Raju Kumar Son Of Indal Ram @ Rudal Ram R/O VillageSatwar, P.S.- G.B.Nagar, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Siwan.

3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person had kidnapped the grand-daughter of the informant with malafide intention.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83336 of 2023(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is no eye witness to the present case. He further submits that the occurrence took place on 05.03.2023 and the FIR was lodged on 20.03.2023, after inordinate delay of fifteen days without any reasonable explanation. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the victim is not recovered by the police till date.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, nature of the offence and the fact that the victim is not recovered by the police till date, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T