← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76239/2019bail granted

Ankit Singh @ Ankit Kr. v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76239 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

ANKIT SINGH @ ANKIT KR. Son of Basant Kumar Singh Residence of Village - Shekhpura Dih, P.S.- Amnour, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. 2.

Dhiraj Kr. Singh @ Dhiraj Kumar @ Dhiraj @ Tamatar Son of Rana Pratap Singh Residence of Mohalla - Yoginia Kothi, P.S.- Chapra Town, Distt.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S.Case No. 130 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding unknown accused persons having intercepted the motorcycle of the informant and thereafter, they are said to have looted cash and motorcycle of the informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the stolen motorcycle has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76239 of 2019(2) dt.02-12-2019 2/2 co-accused person, namely, Pradeep Kumar Manjhi @ Dilip Kumar Manjhi and nothing has been recovered as far as the petitioners are concerned. It is further submitted that no Test Identification Parade has been conducted so as to establish the complicity of the petitioners in the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that only on account of the confessional statement made by the co-accused person, the petitioners have been falsely implicated on account of three earlier cases pending against them in which they are on bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners are languishing in custody since 7.6.2019.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioners on regular bail.

Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 130 of 2019. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T