Gajadhar Yadav @ Gajaghar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42627 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2018 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Gajadhar Yadav @ Gajaghar Yadav Son of Late Chandra Yadav, resident of Village- Rampur Ke Tola, P.S.-M.H.Nagar, District Siwan ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP 200 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.05.2018 in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 registered under Sections 147, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is alleged to be an order giver, the injuries are not attributed to him, but, to other accused persons. Diary in the present case was called for, which has been received.

Learned counsel appearing for the State, after perusal the case diary, submits that there is no further material in the case diary to implicate the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and that the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42627 of 2018(3) dt.06-08-2018 2/2 above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siswan, on the following conditions.

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably father, mother, brother, sister of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T