Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40920 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2018 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar, Son of Ramautar Singh @ Sadhu Yadav, Resident of Village- Chhakan Bigaha, Police Station- Barun, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlendra Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 97/18, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 332, 333, 353, 395, 436, 504, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984.

Allegation against the petitioner and large number of other accused persons that they created an unlawful assembly and obstructed the police party in discharge of their official duty. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. The F.I.R. has been filed against large number of accused persons. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40920 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 97/18, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/-Amjad U T