Nunu Giri @ Pankaj Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77384 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2014 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== NUNU GIRI @ PANKAJ GIRI Son of Dinkar Giri Resident of Village - Pasrela, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 28.08.2019 in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 188 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b) A,26,35 of the Arms Act. Considering the fact that the alleged recoveries were not from the conscious possession of the petitioner and his name has been disclosed by arrested co-accused persons, namely, Ranjit Kumar Chauhan and Prabhat Kumar and that he is having three other criminal antecedents in which he has already been granted bail, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 188 of 2014, subject to the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77384 of 2019(3) dt.20-12-2019 2/2 conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T