Raju Mian @ Md. Ramij Akram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73430 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2018 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Mian @ Md. Ramij Akram, Son of Ekram Mian @ Md. Ekram Hassan, Resident of Village - Simraur, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, Distt - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2020 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Neemchak Bathani P. S. Case No. 103 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, while the son of the informant feeding fish in the pond, the accused persons including the petitioner came into a Bolero vehicle, started indiscriminate firing, due to which, he succumbed injuries at the spot. Apart from that petitioner is accused in seven other cases and it appears from the statement in para 3 in four cases the final form has been submitted.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the deceased was veteran criminal and earlier he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73430 of 2019(3) dt.10-01-2020 2/2 assaulted the petitioner, for which, a case is also going on and due to that he has been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that though there is allegation of firing against several accused persons but only two injuries were found on the person of the deceased. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail by stating that petitioner is accused in nine other cases and though in para 3 it is mentioned about only seven cases. It has also been submitted that there is allegation of firing against all the accused persons and two fire arm injuries were found on the person of the deceased.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

With the above observations, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T