Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41901/2018bail granted

Baidyanath Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-09Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41901 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -74 Year- 2018 Thana -TAJPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Baidyanath Rai S/o Late Jinish Rai.

2. Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar Roy S/o Sri Baidyanath Rai. Both resident of Village- Chaklalsahi, P.S. Tajpur (Halai O.P. ), DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Tajpur (Halai O.P.) P.S.Case No. 74 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354B, 379, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR is that while informant was cutting "Jaw" crop the petitioners came and assaulted her by rod and informant happens to be "Bhabhi" of the petitioners. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute between the parties and dispute arose in relation to cutting of crop and furthermore the injuries are simple in nature.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41901 of 2018 (3) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Tajpur (Halai O.P.) P.S.Case No. 74 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U