Md. Moyajjam @ Ahamad Sah Ansari @ Babaly v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78729 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-906 Year-2022 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== MD. MOYAJJAM @ AHAMAD SAH ANSARI @ BABALY Son of Md. Isa Resident of Village Ansarganj, P.S.- Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ruksana Khatoon Daughter of Late Md. Jalil Resident of Mohalla Karansarai, P.S.- Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 906 of 2022 dated 16.09.2022 registered the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 323, 498A, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the husband of the complainant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78729 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/2 he has no concern with the alleged offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 906 of 2022, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T