Pankaj Singh @ Phakkar @ Pankaj Kumar Phakkar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42502 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -420 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Pankaj Singh @ Phakkar @ Pankaj Kumar Phakkar, son of Sri Ramnath Singh, resident of Village - Basaudha, P.S. - Bihta (Neura O.P.), District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Biha.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2018 in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.420 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 387 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on the basis of vague allegations, the petitioner has been roped in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is willing to abide by the terms and conditions as laid down by this Court, if enlarged on bail.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42502 of 2018 (2) dt.19-07-2018 2/2 bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Danapur, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.420 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4)The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T