← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47878/2018dismissed

Rakesh Kumar @ Karu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47878 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2016 Thana -MOKAMAH District- PATNA ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar @ Karu Singh S/o Late Devendra Singh, R/o Moldiyar Tola, Mahaveer Asthan, Mokama, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner prays for bail in connection with Mokama P.S.Case No. 90 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 236 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the accused persons, including the petitioner is that they have surrounded the informant and made firing on his son, causing injuries to him.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injured in his statement in paragraph 27 of the case diary has not named this petitioner, rather named other accused persons and there is no specific allegation of firing against him. It is also submitted that though he is accused in 14 other cases but he is on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47878 of 2018 (3) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 bail on those cases and he is in custody since 12.12.2017. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that paragraph 27 of the case diary disclosed the hand of the petitioner in his active participation in the crime, apart from that he is accused in 14 other cases.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him bail. Prayer for bail is rejected.

However, let trial be expedited.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T