Ramesh Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44842 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2018 Thana -RATANPURA District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Ramesh Jha S/o Sushil Jha, R/o Vill.- Lalmanpatti, P.S.- Ratanpura, Ward No. 4, District- Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 05/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 307, 448, 379, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the written report there is allegation that eight persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant causing injury on his head. Injury report is annexed as Annexure-2. The doctor has found two injuries on the person of the informant caused by hard and blunt substance, which are opined to be simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44842 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 05/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Birpur, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.)