Nawaz Sharif v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76543 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2019 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

NAWAZ SHARIF Son of Salim Main, under guardianship of Rojidan Khatun @ Rojidin Khatun (mother) Resident of Village - Bahurupia, Dani Mian Tola, Post Office and P.S.- Sugauli, Distt - East Champaran. 2.

Sajaha @ Shahzahan Alam Son of Salim Mian Resident of Village - Bahurupia, Dani Mian Tola, Post Office and P.S.- Sugauli, Distt - East Champaran.

3.

Islam Mian Son of Bholajan Mian @ TMawl Mian. Resident of Village - Bahurupia, Dani Mian Tola, Post Office and P.S.- Sugauli, Distt - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 Earlier prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court by order dated 29.8.2029 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 38214 of 2019 on merit.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that some facts could not be placed before this Court and as such their prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected though prayer for anticipatory bail of some other co-accused persons was allowed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 18.10.2019 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 63907 of 2019. Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76543 of 2019(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 It appears from perusal of the record that considering the merit of the case prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected and, as such I am not inclined to interfere with the earlier order. However, if petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T