Munna Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44780 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2018 Thana -KONCH District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Munna Das S/o Baleshwar Das, R/o Vill.- Shahganj Tola, Azad Bigha, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Veer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Konch P.S. Case No. 155/2018, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 448, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the nephew of the informant. He has been made accused due to dispute and inimical terms between the parties. There is no any injury to the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. The allegation of snatching golden chain from the informant is completely false. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44780 of 2018 (2) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 155/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. III, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T