Parshuram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45205 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2018 Thana -GOPALPUR District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Parshuram Yadav, Son of Bhagirath Yadav, residents of VillageMahanthawan, Police Station- Kateya, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that petitioner has taken Rs.15,000/- and passport from the informant on the pretext to send him abroad. Later on, he gave false visa to the informant. Counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has been compromised between the parties and good sense has been prevailed between them. Xerox copy of compromise petition has been enclosed as Annexure-2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45205 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T