Vikash Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47491 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2018 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar son of Ram Pukar Rai

2. Rajesh Kumar son of Raghunath Rai Both are residents of VillageSalempur Dumaria, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 130 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping minor daughter of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that Medical Board has found the age of girl about 19 years and the allegation of kidnapping is false and concocted. Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant, they have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners by stating that the girl has named the petitioners in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47491 of 2018 (2) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 petitioners have also threatened to kill her. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners rather they should surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which would be considered on its own merit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T