← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48342/2018dismissed

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48342 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -199 Year- 2018 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Ram Vinay Singh, resident of Village- SaharTelpa, P.S. Karpi, District Arwal, at present residing at Mohalla- Satsang Nagar Raja Bazar, P.S.- Town, P.S. Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2018 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 336 of 2018 arising out of Town P.S. Jehanabad Case No. 199/18, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of causing death of his wife.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that a compromise had been made between the parties and the informant had filed a petition in the court below and moreover there is no eye witness of the occurrence and earlier it is the petitioner, who was getting treated the deceased and the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48342 of 2018 (5) dt.01-10-2018 2/2 is in custody since 15.03.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner stating that multiple injuries were found on the person of the deceased and due to caused by asphyxia. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, since petitioner is in custody, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T