Raj Kumar Sah @ Rajkumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79365 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2024 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raj Kumar Sah @ Rajkumar Sah Son of Virendra Sah Resident of Vill.- Dilawarpur, Teliya Tola, P.S.- Kesariya, District - East Champaran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 271 of 2024 instituted under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 351(1) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was returning to home, the accused persons including the petitioner surrounded him and started abusing him. Co-accused Vinod Sah gave blow of sharp khukhari upon the head of the informant due to which he sustained injury on his head. Allegation against the petitioner is that he snatched cash of Rs. 35,000/- from the pocket of the informant and accused Rabindra Sah snatched hanumani made of gold from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79365 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case as a counterblast against Kesariya P.S. Case No. 264 of 2025 filed by the petitioner. He further submits that both the parties are co-villagers and the allegation of snatching cash against the petitioner is an afterthought. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 271 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) AjayMishra/- U T