← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17446/2023disposed

Shobha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-08Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17446 of 2023 ====================================================== Shobha Devi Wife of Balram Choudhary, resident of Mohalla-Gurari Bazar, Patnacity, P.S.-Khajekalan, Post Office-Jhauganj, District-Patna-800008. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

The Assistant Director, Social Security ell, Patna District. 5.

The Executive Officer, Azimabad Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kapileshwar Pd. Yadav, GP-11 Mr. K.N. Jha, AC to GP-11 For the P.M.C.

:

Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. K.N. Jha, learned AC to GP-11 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to file a fresh detailed representation before the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation for considering his claim for payment under 'Kabir Antyeshti Anudan Scheme'.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17446 of 2023(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, is directed to take appropriate decision with respect to the claim of the petitioner. In case, he finds that the consideration made by the Executive Officer, Azimabad Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, with respect to the difference of signature, then he may take appropriate steps to get the signature verified by the handwriting expert. The above exercise is directed to be concluded within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U