Nanhak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48310 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2018 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Nanhak Yadav Son of late Chuttar Yadav Resident of VillageBegampur, P.S. Barachatti, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2016 in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 343 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 18, 20 & 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.

Prosecution case is that police on information that petitioner has kept Doda power in his hotel and is involved in the business of selling Doda, raided his hotel and recovered 250 grams of Doda powder and 4 kg. Doda particles from the premises of the hotel.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Further, he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 25.05.2018 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48310 of 2018 (3) dt.01-10-2018 2/2 Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000, (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, (NDPS Act), Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 343 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T