Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86040/2024bail granted

Prahlad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-09Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86040 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2024 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Prahlad Kumar Son of Chandradeep Yadav Resident of vill-Bishunpur, P.SUmta Dharnai , Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Makhdumpur (Umta Dharnai) P.S. Case No. 458 of 2024 dated 20.09.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(C) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 126(2), 115(2), 125(b), 110 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was apprehended in drunken condition who assaulted on the head of the informant with bricks due to which he sustained injuries on his head and face.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86040 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. As per the injury report of the informant, the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents in which he is acquitted in two cases and he is on bail in three cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur (Umta Dharnai) P.S. Case No. 458 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T