Futush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76647 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2019 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== FUTUSH YADAV Son of Janardan Yadav Resident of Village-Nista, P.S.- Surajgarha, District-Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

The Principal Secretary-cum-Mines Commissioner, Minor and Minerals Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar with Mr. Mayank Bilochan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif For the Mines Department: Mr. Vaishnavi Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 218 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 279, 353, 307, 379, 411, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4/40 of Bihar Mineral Minor Concession Act, 1972, Sections 4, 6 & 8 of Bihar Control of Prevention of Illegal Mining and Transportation and Storage Act, 2003, including Section 15 of Environmental Protection Act, 1986. As per FIR police got information of plying of some tractors loaded with sand intercepted the tractors on chase and some miscreants came on motorcycle, attacked the police and tried to get the tractors released from the custody of police.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76647 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 Petitioner is named in the FIR and he is accused in two other cases of similar type.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been named by local Chaukidar due to some village dispute with him and there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for Mines Department.

In view of above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He has to surrender and pray for regular bail. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T