Dilkhush @ Md. Dilkhush v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79789 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- Kachna District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
Dilkhush @ Md. Dilkhush S/o Late Bangu R/o - Guwagaon, P.S - Kachna, District - Katihar 2.
Md. Akhtar S/o Late Bangu R/o - Guwagaon, P.S - Kachna, District - Katihar 3.
Md. Salim S/o Bhenda R/o - Guwagaon, P.S - Kachna, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 31.05.2025 at 02:00 p.m. when he was returning home, he was intercepted by 15 named accused persons including the petitioners and Md. Mokim assaulted by sword
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79789 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/3 causing injury on head, thereafter Md. Johrul Hasil assaulted by rod causing fracture of knee, further Md. Hasil assaulted Md. Sehrul, who was with the informant, by rod causing injury on head, thereafter Md. Ali assaulted Md. Nazim by sharp weapon and tried to cut his neck, but injury was caused on left hand, further, Md. Malik, Kanni Khatoon and Mulayan Khatoon entered the house of Nurul and took Rs.1,00,000/- while Md. Akhtar tore blouse and saree of Nargis Khatoon.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the accused persons. Though against petitioner no.2, it is alleged that he tore the blouse and saree of Nargis but then it is submitted that the said allegation is an exaggerated allegation. It is also submitted that persons, who are alleged to have assaulted, have been specifically named.
5. Learned APP and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant oppose the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79789 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kachna P.S. Case No.34 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T