Arjun Bin @ Arjun Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83461 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2025 Thana- Geedha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Arjun Bin @ Arjun Mahto Son of Late Wakil Bin, Resident of Village - Songhata, P.S. Gidha, District - Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No.156 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191, 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 74, 352, 351(2) of the BNS.
3. Allegedly, in course of free fight between Bin and Yadav communities, several persons assaulted to each other and thus they sustained injuries. The petitioner is allegedly assaulted one Ranjan Rai, due to which he sustained serious injuries.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner referring to the FIR as well as the impugned order contended that so far the injuries, which are allegedly sustained to the injured Ranjan Rai
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83461 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/3 is concerned, there is only swelling over his right forearm and a wound over left ring finger. Even if the injuries are said to be serious in nature, but admittedly on the non-vital part. Moreover, the petitioner bears fair antecedent and admittedly a free fight took place on account of a dispute of drainage and the petitioner is not a habitual offender.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State submitted that in the said incident various persons have sustained injuries and the petitioner is said to be an offender, who caused injury to Ranjan Rai.
6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the nature of accusation against the petitioner qua the injury sustained to the injured and attributed to the petitioner, besides his fair antecedent, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No.156 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83461 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 3/3 of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U T