Satyendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47404 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -138 Year- 2018 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Satyendra Ram, Son of Belas Ram, Resident of Village- Karup, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 138/18, registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by rod and danda to the father of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injuries are simple in nature. It has further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has falsely been made accused in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47404 of 2018 (2) dt.14-08-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge VII cum ACJM Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 138/18, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T