← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4633/2019dismissed

Lallu Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4633 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18099 of 2018 ====================================================== Lallu Prasad Singh Son of Late Ramnagi Singh Resident of Village- Birna, P.S.- Ghansoi, District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, namely Mr. Deepak Kumar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna, namely Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mahajan.

3.

The Director of Education, Primary Education Department, Bihar, Patna, namely Mr. Ajay Kumar Chaudhary.

4.

The District Education Officer, Buxar, namely Mr. Vinay Kumar Jha. 5.

The Treasury Officer, Buxar, namely Mr. Ajmat Ali Ansari. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Buxar, namely Mr. Rameshwar Singh.

7.

THe District Programme Officer (Primary Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), Buxar, namely Mr. Rajendra Pratap Singh. 8.

The Block Education Officer, Rajpur, Buxar, namely Mr. Ajay Prasad. 9.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Road, Patna, namely Mr. S. Suresh Kumar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rana Ishwar Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Kumar (Gp 17) Mr.Amit Bhushan, AC to GP-17 For Accountant General :

Mr.Vivekanand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order of this Court dated 29.07.2019, passed in CWJC 18099 of 2018, has stood complied with inasmuch as he is getting regular pension and has also been paid the arrears of pension and gratuity, nonetheless, it is prayed that the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.4633 of 2019(2) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 be granted liberty to approach the respondent-authorities, for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

2. The contempt petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U