← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81534/2025allowed

Prince Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-08Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81534 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2025 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Prince Kumar Singh S/o Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh, R/o village - Belsara, P.S-Deo, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kanchan Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Deo P.S. Case No.244 of 2025 instituted under Section 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on getting information about the dispute between two parties due to boring activities, the police reached on the spot and observed that exchange of abusing language is going on between the parties and the conflict is going on between them. It is further alleged that in between it was observed that a person was waging gun and on seeing the police, the said person shifted in his car and on search a country made pistol with live cartridge were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81534 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/2 case due to village politics. He further submits that the petitioner has no concern with the seized pistol or with the vehicle in question. Learned counsel submits that petitioner was neither present at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Aurangabad/ concerned Court in connection with Aurangabad Deo P.S. Case No.244 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T