Rajeshwar Thakur, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4635 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3384 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Rajeshwar Thakur, son of Thagan Thakur, Resident of Village-Dwarkapur, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur.
2.
Brajnandan Mahto, Son of Shankar Mahto, Resident of Village - Itaha Rasul Nagar, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.
Ravi Shankar Kumar, Son of Suryadev Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Muraul, P.s. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur.
4.
Smt. Shiv Kumari Devi, Wife of Sri Mithilesh Kumar, Resident of VillageMuraul, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. 5.
Kumari Pinki, Wife of Naveen Kumar, Resident of Village - Basudeopur Chandei, P.S. Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sri Sanjay Kumar, the Principal Secretary-cumCommissioner, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Dr. Shailesh Prasad Singh, the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.
Dr. Shailesh Prasad Singh, the Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Committee, Muzaffarpur / District programme Manager, District Health Committee, Muzaffarpur.
4.
Sri R.N. Pandey, the Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 5.
Sri K.M. Purve, the Deputy Director, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 6.
Sri Vijay Kumar Sinha, the Regional deputy Director, Health Services, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
7.
Mr. Alok Ranjan Ghosh, the Collector, Muzaffarpur. 8.
Sri Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Sinha, the Deputy Collector (Establishment), Muzaffarpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jagnnath Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad. Yadav (Sc 23) Mr. Madhusudhan Rai, AC to SC-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court MJC No.4635 of 2019(7) dt.07-05-2026 2/2
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s) "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 08.07.2019 passed in CWJC No.3384 of 2018."
3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 02 which shows that vide memo no. 5025 dated 09.10.2025, the Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Muzaffarpur has rejected the claim of the petitioners.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the said order, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U