Ram Prasad @ Ram Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82520 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2020 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Ram Prasad @ Ram Prasad Yadav Son of Late Sukhdev Yadav R/O VillageBudhu Bigha, P.S.- Karpi, Distt.- Arwal 2.

Ramu Kumar Son of Ram Prasad @ Ram Prasad Yadav R/O Village- Budhu Bigha, P.S.- Karpi, Distt.- Arwal 3.

Bablu Kumar Son of Ram Prasad @ Ram Prasad Yadav R/O Village- Budhu Bigha, P.S.- Karpi, Distt.- Arwal 4.

Ramjeet Kumar Son of Ram Prasad @ Ram Prasad Yadav R/O VillageBudhu Bigha, P.S.- Karpi, Distt.- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-12-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 30, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioners is that they and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant's side. Petitioner no.4 is said to have snatched golden chain of Rs.20000/- from the informant.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82520 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The specific allegation is against the co-accused Akhilesh Yadav and Shiv Prasad. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No.131 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T