Sanny Kumar @ Sanny Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85870 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2024 Thana- Panchanpur District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanny Kumar @ Sanny Yadav Son of Suraj Yadav Resident of villageKarhara, PS- Tekari District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kanishk Kaustubh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. .

3. The First Information Report discloses an allegation that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons came variously armed to take forceful possession of the land and the petitioner assaulted one Usha Devi, daughter of the informant by means of iron rod on her head causing her injury. There is a further allegation is that one Lalita Devi also assaulted with bricks over the head of Usha Devi.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are not correct and as a matter of fact, he has been falsely implicated on account of the land dispute as mentioned in the FIR itself. Further one of the co-accused namely Indu Kumari had filed an FIR being

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85870 of 2024(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024 dated 30.06.2024 disclosing an allegation against the present informant of having assaulted the said Indu Kumari and her family members. Hence, there is a case and counter case and injuries have been suffered on both the sides. Further submission is that the injury report of Usha Devi would go to show that she has suffered a simple injury. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T