Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80048 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Chandan Kumar S/o Ajay Sao Resident of village - Hassanpura, P.SShakurabad, District -Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Mistry, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.580 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, due to dispute over keeping the cow dung, the petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons armed with lathi and danda came and started abusing and assaulting the husband of the informant causing injury on his head. It is alleged that co-accused Dhananjay Kumar assaulted by means of rod causing injury on the hand of husband of informant. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the son and daughter of the informant by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80048 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 means of rod causing injury to them on their head and hand respectively.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted the son of informant i.e. Saurabh Kumar and daughter Anjali Kumari and the injury report of Saurabh Kumar shows that he has sustained the simple injury, whereas there is no injury report with respect to Anjali Kumari. Learned counsel submits that both the parties are family members and there is a dispute in the family with regard to retiremental money. He further submits that petitioner is a young boy aged about 22 years, having got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80048 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.580 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T