Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49036/2018bail granted

Raj Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49036 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2017 Thana -NARHAT District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Raj Kumar Manjhi, Son of Harbansh Manjhi, resident of Village- Mani Bagi Tungi (Near High School), P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Narhat P.S.Case No. 173 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that her statement under Section 164 Cr. P .C. has been recorded which shows that she is major and her statement further disclosed that she is consenting party and she was taken to Patna and then at Mankapur but she did not raise hullah and petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49036 of 2018 (3) dt.01-10-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate- V, Nawada in connection with Narhat P.S.Case No. 173 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T