← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52203/2018rejected

Vikky Kumar @ Chhotoo v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52203 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Vikky Kumar @ Chhotoo son of Chandradeo Singh, resident of VillageWashilpur, Bala Bigha, P.S.- Arwal, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Arwal Mahila P.S.Case No. 18 of 2017, registered for the offence under Sections 376, 120 (B), 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 C and 66 D of Information Technology Act. Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is of committing rape upon the informant and taking semi naked photographs on his mobile with intimate scene and making them viral on mobile.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier the informant was given an Informatory petition No. 155 of 2018 stating that she had love affair with one

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52203 of 2018 (2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 Angad Kumar and there is nothing to show against the petitioner and the mobile does not belong to the petitioner rather belong to the brother of the informant.

Heard learned A.P.P. who opposes the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and statement of the informant under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which has been annexed with Annexure-2 to this petition, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, as the petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2018 the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within a reasonable period as fixed.

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T