Shashikant Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1773 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- ====================================================== SHASHIKANT GUPTA Son of Sri Ram Pravesh Gupta @ Ram Pravesh Sah Resident of Gram - Dudhnidehri, P.S.- Tilauthu, P.O.- Hurka, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, Sasaram. 4.

Mukesh Kumar @ Manish Kumar Singh Son of Mahendra Singh Gram - Nirmalpur, P.S.- Akaurhigola, District - Rohtas. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 This is totally a misconceived writ application inasmuch as it appears that the dispute between the two parties under certain contract is a matter of grievance in the present writ application and the petitioner is in fact looking for enforcement what is said to be a contract between him and respondent no. 4. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner despite waiting for some time.

Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that the writ application is fit to be dismissed in the given facts and circumstances of the case.

On perusal of the records, this Court finds that according to the petitioner, he had entered into a rent agreement

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1773 of 2019(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 as contained in Annexure '1' with respondent no. '4'. He claims that he had given Rs. 8,000/- under a lease-deed but later on respondent no. 4 was demanding extra money of Rs. 2.50 Lakhs. It is the case of the petitioner that he denied giving that extra amount by the petitioner on which a dispute arose and then some assault took place with the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the writ application as framed is not fit to be entertained. In case the petitioner has any grievance against the private respondent, he may seek his remedy in an appropriate proceeding and in accordance with law.

This writ application is disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U