← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86454/2024dismissed

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-27Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86454 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2023 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/o Arjun Choudhary Resident Of Village- Amer Ghat, PsBidupur, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivjee Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 354, 506, 504/34 of the IPC.

3. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on his head with intention to kill him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that occurrence took place on 08.03.2023 but FIR has been lodged on 20.03.2024 after delay of 12 days. He submits that both parties are own agnates. He further submits that petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.10.2024.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86454 of 2024(2) dt.27-01-2025 2/2

5. Learned APP for the State and informant oppose the prayer for bail and submit that the injury found upon the victim is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 234 of 2023.

7. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T