← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75599/2019bail granted

Sanjit Sah @ Sanjit Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75599 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1052 Year-2018 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== SANJIT SAH @ SANJIT KUMAR SAHU Son of Late Ganesh Sahu Resident of Village-Sakri Koshi Badhiyam, P.S.-Sakari, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Jyoti Kumari @ Jyto Devi Wife of Sanjit Sah @ Sanjit Kumar Sah Resident of Village-Sakri Koshi Badhiyam, P.S.-Sakari, District-Madhubani, at present address- D/o Sankar Sah, resident of Balmiki Nagar, P.S.- Noniyatol, Ward No.20, P.S. and District-Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498(A), 379 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 1052 (C15) of 2018/1052(CR).

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation of demand of dowry and inflicting cruelty are denied. The petitioner expresses his readiness to keep the opposite party n o. 2 with due dignity and honour. The petitioner claims clean antecedent.

4. Despite service of notice on opposite party no. 2, none appears to represent her when the matter is called today.

5. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75599 of 2019(5) dt.06-03-2020 2/2 arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Vinay Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 1052(C15) of 2018/1052(CR), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T