Raja Kumar @ Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78666 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Raja Kumar @ Raj Kumar S/o Birbal Manjhi R/o Village- Mastipur, P.S.- Bodh-Gaya, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 333, 324(5) 324(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 19 years and the informant alleges that accused persons entered his guest house and committed loot, on information the informant reached the place of occurrence when petitioner assaulted him by butt of pistol causing injury on head and he became unconscious.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78666 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that it does not appear probable that person known to the informant would have entered his guest house for committing loot. It is further submitted that a specific pleading has been made at para-14 of the anticipatory bail application that informant with his other associates had entered in the house of the petitioner and had tried to outrage the modesty of the mother of the petitioner for which the petitioner has given application to the concerned PS as well as SSP Gaya on 12-3-2025, but then no action was taken nor any FIR was registered, as such the informant in the instant case falsely implicated the petitioner.

It is also submitted that the guest house is well guarded and thus it is not possible to commit loot. It is submitted that petitioner is a young boy aged about 19 years and if he is sent to judicial custody in the nature of allegation as alleged, his entire career would get jeopardized and the chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78666 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Birbal Manjhi.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T