Sinod Ravidas @ Sinodh Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83025 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2023 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Sinod Ravidas @ Sinodh Ravidas S/o- Late Antu Ravidas @ Anthu Das Resident of Village- Karay Chakiya, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna 2.
Ramanuj Das S/o- Late Antu Ravidas @ Anthu Das Resident of VillageKaray Chakiya, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satish Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is alleged that sister of informant was married with co-accused Pramod Das in the year 2011 and from the wedlock, two children were born and thereafter, all the accused persons including these petitioners started committing torture to sister of informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 2 lacs and one motorcycle, as dowry, and on 20.05.2023, the informant received an information that accused persons have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83025 of 2024(2) dt.27-01-2025 2/3 killed his sister and disposed her dead-body.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are brothers-in-law of the deceased and they are separate in mess & property and have got no concern with the affairs of deceased & her husband. There is general and omnibus allegation of demand of dowry & committing torture against these petitioners and no specific overt act has been alleged against them. It is further submitted that informant is not an eyewitness to the occurrence. Thrust of the allegation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody, as per statement made in paragraph no. 10 to the bail petition. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, District -Patna, in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 345 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83025 of 2024(2) dt.27-01-2025 3/3 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T