← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3044/2018disposed

Faiyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amir Subhani The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of B

2018-11-28Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3044 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1632 of 2015 ====================================================== Faiyaz Ahmad son of late Mukhtar Ahmad, resident of mohalla- Kalali Bagan, P.S.- Dhanbad town, district- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Sri Amir Subhani The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri K.S. Dwiwedi, The Director, General of Police Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Sunil Kumar, The Inspector General of Police Bihar, Muzaffarpur.

4. Sri Lalan Mohan Prasad, The Deputy Inspector General of Police Champaran range, Bethiah.

5. Sri Jayant Kant, The Superintendent of Police District, West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma - Aag 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-11-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.

A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State. It is submitted by the Opposite parties that entire admissible dues in terms of the order dated 18.6.2018 passed in CWJC No. 1632 of 2015 has been paid to the petitioner. The said position is not disputed by the Counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the authorities for interest on the dues which have been paid to him.

This Court would find that there is no such direction

Patna High Court MJC No.3044 of 2018(3) dt.28-11-2018 2/2 in the order passed in the writ proceedings for grant of interest to the petitioner. There is no need for keeping the instant contempt proceeding pending since the substantial order has been complied with.

The contempt proceeding is dropped.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U