Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80130 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2024 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/O Sanjay Kumar R/O Village - Kahudag, P.S- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 561 of 2024 dated 27.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 111 and 317(4) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information, police apprehended two co-accused Dilchand and Rajesh with the stolen motorcycles and at their instances, police also apprehended the other co-accused along with the petitioner with the stolen motorcycles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80130 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37969 of 2025. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 561 of 2024, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T