Chandan Kumar Chaurasiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75051 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2019 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR CHAURASIYA S/o Ram Ekbal Chaurasiya R/o village- Akhtiyarpur, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Informant in his written complaint has alleged that on confidential information he reached the place of occurrence and 22.500 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from the poultry farm of one Rajiv Kumar @ Vicky.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 01.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75051 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case No. 149 of 2019 (Computer Regn No. 1171 of 2019), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U