Sachin Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78993 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2025 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Sachin Kumar Yadav Son of Pawan Yadav R/o Village- Sobhadra, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No.295 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 132, 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3.

The police received secret information that some criminal have assembled to commit a dacoity. On the basis of such information, the police reached near a poultry farm and upon seeing the police party some criminals started firing upon the police party. In retaliation, the police party also fired upon them and apprehended some persons including the petitioner. 4.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating material has been recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78993 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/3 from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the real fact is that the petitioner went to poultry farm for purchasing chicken meat along with one Satendra Patel and in the meantime, police arrived and started firing upon some persons and after hearing the sound of firing the petitioner started running away to save himself and in the meantime the police apprehended him mere on the basis of suspicion. 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 08.08.2025 without any fault.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra / concerned Court below, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No.295 of 2025.

7.

This is also subject to the condition that the petitioner, after being released on bail, is directed to mark his attendance at Manjhi Police Station, District- Saran at Chapra on first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78993 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 3/3 appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

8.

As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the antecedent of the petitioner. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall only be accepted by the court below if it is found that he has clean antecedent. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T