← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3165/2018disposed

Navin Kumar @ Naveen Kumar @ Navin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3165 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2016 Thana- SC/ST District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Navin Kumar @ Naveen Kumar S/o Sri Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Singh, R/o Vill.- Sabha Sasaula (Sasaulakala), P.S.- Mejorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s :

Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 Heard the parties.

The appellant seeks pre-arrest bail in Sitamarhi SC/ST P.S. Case No.1716 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 420, 406, 467, 120(B), 504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(i)(x) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Allegation as per the F.I.R. is that some of the accused persons abated the informant through the appellant in order to get job in civil court and that when the informant gave Rs.3/- lacs to the appellant who demanded Rs.5/- lacs to provide job and the informant gave Rs.3/- lacs in four installments in RTGS in the Account of the appellant but he did not get the job and when he asked for the same he was threatened by the petitioner by his caste name.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3165 of 2018(6) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the Account Number which has been mentioned in the F.I.R. does not belong to the appellant and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Heard learned Special P.P. also. Who opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that the F.I.R. itself shows that the amount has been supplied to the Account of the appellant through the R.T.G.S. and, as such, it cannot be said that the allegation is false and concocted.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the appellant, above named, surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and pray for regular bail and the trial court shall consider the same on the basis of the materials available on the record without being prejudiced by this order. With this observation, this appeal is disposed of. aks/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U