← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83247/2024allowed

Bittu Ram @ Bhaso Ram @ Bhaso v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-18Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83247 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Bittu Ram @ Bhaso Ram @ Bhaso, S/O Yogendra Ram, R/O Vill.- Hathidah Dih, P.S- Hathidah, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-03-2025 Heard Mr. Mayank Bilochan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the tractor of the informant was stolen.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He was remanded in this case from another case. It has also been submitted that there is no recovery from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83247 of 2024(3) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 custody since 30.07.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases of similar nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts that the name of the petitioner is not there in the F.I.R. and nothing has been recovered from his possession, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T