Pramod Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52547 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -249 Year- 2018 Thana -GARKHA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar Rai, Son of Bhola Rai, Resident of Village + P.S.- Akilpur, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta Mr. Rajiv Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 249 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 339, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a. 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Prosecution case is that police on information that some persons have assembled and making preparation for committing dacoity, raided the place and apprehended the petitioner and others and from the possession of petitioner one dagger was recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and has been in judicial custody since 19.06.2018. Further he has no criminal antecedent and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52547 of 2018 (2) dt.05-10-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000, (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-XIV, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 249 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T