Yogendra Kumar Singh @ Yogendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78948 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Yogendra Kumar Singh @ Yogendra Singh S/O Rajendra Singh R/o Vill.- Dhani Chapra, P.S - Manjhi, District - Chapra, Saran 2.
Virendra Singh @ Virendra Kumar Singh S/O Late Bhuneshwar Singh @ Bhuneshwar Singh R/o Vill.- Dhani Chapra, P.S - Manjhi, District - Chapra, Saran 3.
Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar Singh S/O Raj Kishore Singh. R/o Vill.- Dhani Chapra, P.S - Manjhi, District - Chapra, Saran 4.
Brij Kishore Singh S/O Late Laxman Singh. R/o Vill. - Dhani Chapra, P.S - Manjhi, District - Chapra, Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2),126(2),109,352,351(2),351(3),3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners have assaulted the informant, as a result of which, he sustained injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78948 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in a false case. There is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence in which, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the person of the informant without intention. The injury sustained by the informant is found to be simple in nature.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, and also the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and due to a dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the person of the informant and the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78948 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Saran (Chapra) / Concerned Court in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T