Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53292/2018bail granted

Bijendra Das v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-05Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53292 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2018 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bijendra Das, aged about 25 Years, S/o Late Lalu Das, R/o Tarwahi, P.S.- Laukahi, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tilak Sao For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Laukaha P.S. Case No. 19 of 2018, instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR is against unknown. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The name of the petitioner has come in this case on the basis of his confessional statement. It has been submitted that the police arrested the petitioner on suspicion and recorded his confessional statement. The petitioner is in custody since 23.05.2018. He has not been put on TIP till date. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53292 of 2018(3) dt.05-10-2018 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in Laukaha P.S. Case No. 19 of 2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (iii) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T