Anjani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17096 of 2018 ====================================================== Anjani Kumari, Wife of Sudhanshu Shekhar, resident of Lachhaminiya Chowk, Dumrail, Ward No. 33, Nagar Parishad, Saharsa, P.S. & DistrictSaharsa. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Saharsa.
4. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Saharsa.
5. The Block Development Officer, Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa.
6. Bhupendra Yadav (the then Sarpanch, Ajgeba Panchayat) Son of late Lal Bihari Yadav, resident of Village- Ajgela, P.S. Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa.
7. Binda Devi(Present Parpanch, Ajgeba Panchayat) Wife of Bhupendra Yadav Resident of Village- Ajgeba, P.S. Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kumar Alok- SC-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is claiming that she is working as Secretary of Gram Kachachari, Ajgeba, Gram Panchayat Raj-Ajgeba under Saur Bazar Block, DistrictSaharsa since 2007, but from 2011 she is not getting her salary/honorarium. The claim has been made that she should be paid the said amount. However, from the order of the first appellate authority, it appears that he has remanded back the
Patna High Court CWJC No.17096 of 2018(2) dt.11-12-2018 2/2 matter to the Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer for fresh consideration.
When the matter is pending before the Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, then there is no question of entertainment of this petition. The petitioner should pursue the remedy which she has already opted and the authority concerned is directed to take decision in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U