Sagar Kumar @ Yuraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80268 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Sagar Kumar @ Yuraj Kumar S/o- Sanjay Ram Resident Of VillageRasidpur, Ps- Garkha, Dist-Chapra, Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 329(3), 74, 303(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 08.07.2025 at about 9 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, came and assaulted daughter of informant and her husband with fist and slaps and threw husband of daughter of informant from the bridge due to which he died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80268 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/2 alleged occurrence and merely on suspicion, petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, assaulted daughter of informant and her husband and threw husband of daughter of informant off the bridge due to which he died.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T